This report is powered by Powerdrill—an AI-driven data analysis tool designed to boost your productivity.

Try its one-click report generation today at https://powerdrill.ai.

About the dataset

The dataset "nasdq_table_0.csv" provides a comprehensive view of the NASDAQ market and related economic indicators over a period, with 3,914 entries and 13 key columns. The data includes daily records of stock market metrics such as 'Open', 'High', 'Low', and 'Close' prices, along with 'Volume' of shares traded. Additionally, it encompasses economic indicators like 'InterestRate', 'ExchangeRate', 'VIX' (Volatility Index), 'TEDSpread', 'EFFR' (Effective Federal Funds Rate), 'Gold', and 'Oil' prices.

From the sample data, we observe that on April 15, 2010, the stock opened at 7.41 and closed slightly lower at 7.39, with a high trading volume of 8,909,400 shares. The interest rate was relatively low at 0.2, and the VIX was 15.89, indicating moderate market volatility. By June 17, 2010, the stock price had decreased, opening at 6.51 and closing at 6.44, with a lower volume of 4,932,000 shares. The VIX increased to 25.05, suggesting higher market uncertainty.

Statistical analysis of the key columns reveals that the average 'Open' price is 29.22, with a standard deviation of 386.88, indicating significant variability in stock prices. The 'Volume' shows a mean of 3,708,611.34, highlighting the scale of trading activity. Economic indicators such as 'InterestRate' and 'ExchangeRate' have means of 1.19, reflecting stable economic conditions over the period. The dataset provides valuable insights into the interplay between market performance and economic factors, useful for investors and analysts alike.

Yearly Trends in Open and High Values: A Correlation Analysis

The analysis reveals a strong correlation between the mean opening values and the maximum high values over the years, as indicated by a Pearson correlation coefficient of approximately 0.999. This suggests that as the average opening prices increase, the maximum high prices tend to rise correspondingly, reflecting a consistent upward trend in the data. 

The visualization illustrates this relationship clearly, with both the mean opening values (depicted by the dashed blue line) and the maximum high values (represented by the solid green line) showing a significant upward trajectory from 2010 to 2024. Notably, the gap between the two lines narrows over time, indicating that the opening prices are increasingly aligning with the highs, which may suggest a more stable market environment or improved performance in the underlying assets during this period.

Analysis of Gold and Oil Production Trends Over Time

The visualization presents a clustering analysis of the total production of Gold and Oil over time, highlighting the relationship between these two commodities. The x-axis represents the aggregated sum of Oil, while the y-axis shows the aggregated sum of Gold. The clustering of data points indicates that there are specific periods where the production levels of Gold and Oil exhibit similar trends, suggesting potential correlations in their market dynamics.

Notably, the presence of a single red point, which appears to be an outlier, indicates a significant deviation from the general trend observed in the majority of the data points. This outlier could represent an unusual event or anomaly in production, warranting further investigation. Overall, the clustering pattern suggests that while there are common trends in Gold and Oil production, there are also distinct periods of divergence that could be influenced by external factors such as market demand, geopolitical events, or changes in production technology.

Yearly Trends in Average Opening Values

The analysis reveals a clear upward trend in the average opening values from 2010 to 2024. The visualization indicates that the mean "Open" values have steadily increased over the years, suggesting a positive growth trajectory in the dataset. This trend is particularly pronounced in the latter years, where the values show significant spikes, indicating potential market or operational changes that may have influenced these averages.

The statistical attributes further support this observation, with an R-squared value of approximately 0.93, indicating a strong correlation between the year and the average opening values. The intercept of -5.37 suggests that the trend line starts below zero, but the consistent increase in values over time highlights a robust growth pattern. The scope of 4.37 indicates the range of values observed, reinforcing the notion of a significant upward movement in the average opening values throughout the analyzed period.

Analysis of Daily Closing Prices and Exchange Rates

The visualization illustrates the relationship between daily closing prices and exchange rates over a specified period. The data reveals a strong positive correlation, indicated by a Pearson correlation coefficient of approximately 0.996. This suggests that as the closing prices fluctuate, the exchange rates tend to move in a similar direction, highlighting a significant interdependence between these two variables.

The graph shows that the closing prices exhibit a relatively stable trend with minor fluctuations, while the exchange rates display a gradual decline towards the end of the observed period. The sharp drop in closing prices at the beginning may indicate an external event or market reaction that influenced both metrics. Overall, the consistent correlation suggests that monitoring these two variables together could provide valuable insights for forecasting and decision-making in financial contexts.

Analysis of Oil and Close Price Clusters Over Time

The visualization presents a scatter plot illustrating the relationship between the aggregated "Close" prices and "Oil" values over time. The data points are densely clustered, indicating a strong correlation between these two variables. The majority of the points are concentrated in a specific range, suggesting that as the "Close" prices fluctuate, the "Oil" values exhibit a similar pattern, reinforcing the interconnectedness of these metrics.

 Notably, there are a few outliers, particularly the red point at approximately (36.59, -40), which stands out from the rest of the data. This anomaly may warrant further investigation, as it could represent an unusual event or error in the data collection process. Overall, the clustering of data points suggests that trends in "Close" prices could be predictive of movements in "Oil" values, highlighting the importance of monitoring these metrics together for better forecasting and analysis.

What trends can be observed in the 'Close' prices over the given time period?

Moving Averages and Patterns

50-day Moving Average (MA_50): The mean is 29.09, indicating a general upward trend over time, with a maximum of 72.60.

200-day Moving Average (MA_200): The mean is slightly lower at 28.83, showing a more stable long-term trend with less volatility compared to the 50-day average.

Peaks and Troughs

Peaks: The highest peak in the 'Close' prices is 75.24, suggesting significant upward movements at certain points.

Troughs: The lowest trough is 5.77, indicating periods of decline or correction in the market. 

Visual Trends

 Overall Upward Trend: The line chart shows a clear upward trajectory in 'Close' prices over the years, with some fluctuations.

Moving Averages: Both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages follow the upward trend, with the 50-day average showing more sensitivity to short-term changes.

Conclusion and Insights

Long-term Growth: The data indicates a strong long-term growth trend in 'Close' prices, supported by both moving averages.

Market Volatility: The presence of peaks and troughs highlights periods of market volatility, which are typical in financial markets.

How does the 'Volume' of trades correlate with the 'Close' prices, and can this relationship be visualized effectively?

Correlation Coefficient

Correlation Coefficient: The correlation coefficient between 'Volume' and 'Close' prices is approximately -0.39. This indicates a moderate negative correlation, suggesting that as the volume of trades increases, the closing price tends to decrease, and vice versa. 

Visualization of the Relationship

Scatter Plot: The scatter plot illustrates the relationship between 'Volume' and 'Close' prices. The plot shows a concentration of data points at lower volumes with a wide range of closing prices, supporting the negative correlation observed.

Conclusion and Insights

Moderate Negative Correlation: There is a moderate negative correlation between trade volume and closing prices, indicating that higher volumes are generally associated with lower closing prices.

Effective Visualization: The scatter plot effectively visualizes this relationship, showing the spread and concentration of data points that align with the calculated correlation coefficient.

What is the relationship between 'Gold' prices and 'Oil' prices, and how can this be visualized to show any potential correlation?

Correlation Analysis

 Correlation Coefficient: The correlation coefficient between 'Gold' prices and 'Oil' prices is approximately 0.22. This indicates a weak positive correlation, suggesting that as gold prices increase, oil prices tend to increase slightly as well, but the relationship is not strong.

Visualization

Scatter Plot: The scatter plot of 'Gold' prices versus 'Oil' prices shows a dispersed pattern with no clear linear trend. This visual representation supports the weak correlation found in the numerical analysis.

Conclusion and Insights

Weak Positive Correlation: The relationship between 'Gold' and 'Oil' prices is weakly positive, indicating that changes in one do not strongly predict changes in the other. 

Visual Confirmation: The scatter plot confirms the weak correlation, showing a lack of a distinct pattern or trend between the two variables.