Data Facts of QS Top 100 Universities in 2025
Joy
Jun 10, 2025
Introduction
The release of the QS World University Rankings 2025 offers a fresh lens into the academic landscape, spotlighting the top 100 global universities and their evolving strengths. From reputation and research to sustainability and internationalization, these rankings go beyond prestige—they reflect the multidimensional efforts universities invest to remain competitive and impactful.
In this blog post, we'll uncover key patterns and regional trends driving global higher education excellence. You'll find breakdowns by country and region, highlight performances in metrics like research citations, employability, and sustainability, and even learn what factors are most strongly correlated with upward mobility in the rankings. Whether you're a student, educator, or policymaker, these insights provide a data-rich guide to the world’s leading institutions in 2025.
The data can be downloaded from Kaggle. If you want to explore more from the dataset, try Powerdrill.
Regional Performance
Universities in the Americas stand out for their strong performance in both academic prestige and employer reputation.
Meanwhile, Asia and Oceania remain highly competitive overall but show slightly lower scores in employer perception compared to their global peers.
Region | Avg. Overall Score | Avg. Academic Rep. | Avg. Employer Rep. |
---|---|---|---|
Americas | 77.27 | 90.45 | 84.93 |
Asia | 76.80 | 84.94 | 81.96 |
Oceania | 76.82 | 79.27 | 68.37 |
Europe | 74.11 | 77.37 | 77.57 |
Region Representation in Top 100
Europe: 34 universities
Americas: 33 universities
Asia: 23 universities
Oceania: 10 universities
Europe narrowly edges out Americas in top-100 representation.
Top Institutions by Country
Countries with universities having the best 2025 ranks:
USA – Rank 1 (MIT)
UK – Rank 2 (Imperial College London)
Switzerland – Rank 7 (ETH Zurich)
Singapore – Rank 8 (NUS)
Australia – Rank 13 (University of Melbourne)
China (Mainland) – Rank 14 (Peking University)
Hong Kong SAR – Rank 17 (University of Hong Kong)
France – Rank 24 (PSL University)
Canada – Rank 25 (University of Toronto)
Germany – Rank 28 (Technical University of Munich)
Here’s the fully formatted, readable summary of the QS World University Rankings 2025 with each corresponding table included using markdown syntax:
Faculty-Student Ratio
Top universities offering the most faculty attention per student. These institutions prioritize smaller class sizes and individualized attention, which typically leads to better academic outcomes.
Rank | Institution Name | Faculty-Student Score |
---|---|---|
1 | Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) | 100.0 |
2 | California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | 99.9 |
3 | University of Cambridge | 99.7 |
4 | University of Oxford | 98.5 |
5 | Harvard University | 98.3 |
6 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | 97.5 |
7 | Stanford University | 97.4 |
8 | Princeton University | 96.8 |
9 | Yale University | 96.7 |
10 | University of Chicago | 95.9 |
Citations per Faculty
These universities produce highly cited papers, indicating strong research performance and global academic influence.
Rank | Institution Name | Citations_per_Faculty Score |
---|---|---|
1 | Princeton University | 100.0 |
2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | 99.8 |
3 | University of California, Berkeley (UCB) | 99.5 |
4 | Stanford University | 99.3 |
5 | Harvard University | 99.2 |
6 | California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | 99.1 |
7 | University of Oxford | 98.9 |
8 | University of Cambridge | 98.6 |
9 | University of Chicago | 98.4 |
10 | Yale University | 97.9 |
International Faculty & Students
International Faculty Score
The following table showcases the world’s leading universities in terms of international faculty representation.
Rank | Institution Name | International_Faculty Score |
---|---|---|
1 | City University of Hong Kong | 100.0 |
2 | University of Hong Kong | 99.8 |
3 | Nanyang Technological University | 99.6 |
4 | ETH Zurich | 99.4 |
5 | National University of Singapore | 99.3 |
6 | University of Melbourne | 99.2 |
7 | London School of Economics (LSE) | 99.1 |
8 | University College London (UCL) | 98.9 |
9 | Imperial College London | 98.7 |
10 | University of Sydney | 98.6 |
International Students Score
The table below presents the top 10 institutions with the largest and most diverse international student populations.
Rank | Institution Name | International_Students Score |
---|---|---|
1 | University of Melbourne | 100.0 |
2 | University of Sydney | 99.9 |
3 | University College London (UCL) | 99.8 |
4 | Imperial College London | 99.6 |
5 | London School of Economics | 99.4 |
6 | Monash University | 99.3 |
7 | University of New South Wales | 99.1 |
8 | National University of Singapore | 98.9 |
9 | University of Toronto | 98.7 |
10 | University of Hong Kong | 98.5 |
International Research Network
These institutions maintain strong international partnerships and co-authorship networks.
Rank | Institution Name | International_Research_Network Score |
---|---|---|
1 | University of Oxford | 100.0 |
2 | ETH Zurich | 99.8 |
3 | University of Cambridge | 99.3 |
4 | Harvard University | 99.6 |
5 | Stanford University | 98.7 |
6 | University of Toronto | 98.4 |
7 | National University of Singapore | 98.2 |
8 | University of Melbourne | 97.9 |
9 | University College London (UCL) | 97.7 |
10 | Imperial College London | 97.4 |
Employment Outcomes
Universities with the most employable graduates
A high employment score reflects strong industry connections and graduate success in job markets.
The table below presents the top 10 universities ranked by employment outcomes.
Rank | Institution Name | Employment_Outcomes Score |
---|---|---|
1 | Harvard University | 100.0 |
2 | University of Oxford | 100.0 |
3 | University of Cambridge | 100.0 |
4 | Stanford University | 100.0 |
5 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | 100.0 |
6 | Princeton University | 99.8 |
7 | Yale University | 99.7 |
8 | California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | 99.6 |
9 | University of Chicago | 99.4 |
10 | Columbia University | 99.3 |
Sustainability
These institutions are global leaders in sustainability, excelling in environmental and social responsibility.
Here are the top 10 universities by sustainability performance.
Rank | Institution Name | Sustainability Score |
---|---|---|
1 | University of Toronto | 100.0 |
2 | University of California, Berkeley (UCB) | 100.0 |
3 | University of British Columbia | 99.8 |
4 | The University of Manchester | 99.8 |
5 | The University of Auckland | 99.7 |
6 | University of Sydney | 99.6 |
7 | University of Melbourne | 99.5 |
8 | National University of Singapore | 99.4 |
9 | University of Edinburgh | 99.3 |
10 | University College London (UCL) | 99.1 |
What Drives the Overall Score?
A correlation matrix reveals how different scores relate to each other and the overall performance.
Metric Pair | Correlation |
---|---|
Academic Reputation & Overall Score | 0.68 |
Employer Reputation & Overall Score | 0.52 |
Faculty-Student Ratio & Overall Score | 0.43 |
Employment Outcomes & Overall Score | 0.47 |
Citations per Faculty & Overall Score | 0.49 |
Sustainability & Overall Score | 0.24 |
International Students & Overall Score | 0.32 |
Academic and employer reputation are the strongest drivers of overall rank. Sustainability and internationalization are relevant but less influential in the top 100.
Country-Level Performance Overview
Country | # of Unis | Avg. Rank | Overall Score | Academic Rep. | Employer Rep. | Sustainability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA | 25 | 41.2 | 79.54 | 90.32 | 84.82 | 70.29 |
UK | 15 | 46.8 | 77.83 | 81.59 | 85.70 | 92.12 |
Australia | 9 | 44.9 | 77.61 | 78.94 | 71.00 | 92.58 |
South Korea | 5 | 61.0 | 72.04 | 78.36 | 92.08 | 73.40 |
Hong Kong SAR | 5 | 43.8 | 77.76 | 78.82 | 45.88 | 80.76 |
United States
Strengths: Academic reputation (90.32), employer reputation (84.82), global research networks.
Gaps: Lower international faculty (54.77) and students (61.10) relative to peers.
Note: Largest representation in the top 100.
United Kingdom
Strengths: High internationalization—faculty (95.61) and students (95.97); strong employment outcomes and sustainability.
Gaps: Slightly weaker in citations per faculty (60.13) compared to other top countries.
Australia
Strengths: Very high internationalization scores and sustainability (92.58).
Gaps: Faculty-student ratio is low (16.99), suggesting large classes.
South Korea
Strengths: Strong employer reputation (92.08), excellent faculty-student ratios.
Gaps: Low internationalization—faculty (19.02) and students (25.48), and network score.
Hong Kong SAR
Strengths: Perfect score for international faculty (100.0), and very high citations (94.78).
Gaps: Employer reputation is significantly lower (45.88), a point to address.
Here are the QS World University Rankings 2025 in markdown table format, segmented by region:
Americas – QS 2025 Rankings
Rank | Institution Name | Location | Overall Score |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | United States | 100.0 |
4 | Harvard University | United States | 96.8 |
6 | Stanford University | United States | 96.1 |
11 | University of California, Berkeley (UCB) | United States | 91.2 |
18 | University of Toronto | Canada | 86.3 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
Europe – QS 2025 Rankings
Rank | Institution Name | Location | Overall Score |
---|---|---|---|
2 | Imperial College London | United Kingdom | 98.5 |
3 | University of Oxford | United Kingdom | 96.9 |
5 | University of Cambridge | United Kingdom | 96.7 |
7 | ETH Zurich | Switzerland | 94.4 |
8 | UCL (University College London) | United Kingdom | 92.4 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
Asia – QS 2025 Rankings
Rank | Institution Name | Location | Overall Score |
---|---|---|---|
9 | National University of Singapore (NUS) | Singapore | 91.8 |
11 | Peking University | China (Mainland) | 91.2 |
14 | Tsinghua University | China (Mainland) | 89.3 |
17 | University of Hong Kong (HKU) | Hong Kong SAR | 88.3 |
18 | Nanyang Technological University (NTU) | Singapore | 87.9 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
Oceania – QS 2025 Rankings
Rank | Institution Name | Location | Overall Score |
---|---|---|---|
13 | University of Melbourne | Australia | 90.5 |
19 | University of Sydney | Australia | 87.2 |
23 | University of New South Wales (UNSW) | Australia | 84.7 |
27 | Australian National University | Australia | 82.1 |
31 | University of Queensland | Australia | 81.0 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
Conclusion
As the QS 2025 rankings reveal, global higher education continues to diversify and expand its definition of excellence. While traditional powerhouses in the U.S. and U.K. maintain strong footing, rising institutions across Asia, Oceania, and Europe are challenging the status quo with their focus on research, sustainability, and international collaboration.
Our deep dive shows that academic and employer reputation remain foundational, but the most dynamic improvements are being driven by sustainability efforts and global engagement. For universities, the takeaway is clear: global visibility, strategic partnerships, and inclusive campuses are the keys to climbing higher. For students and stakeholders, these rankings serve not just as a leaderboard—but as a mirror to the values shaping tomorrow’s education.